IMMEDIATE EFFECT OF NEURODYNAMIC SLIDING TECHNIQUE VERSUS MULLIGAN BENT LEG RAISE TECHNIQUE ON HAMSTRING FLEXIBILITY IN ASYMPTOMATIC INDIVIDUALS

Authors

  • Vinod K. Babu K.T.G. College of Physiotherapy and KTG Multi Speciality Hospital, Bangalore-560 091, India.
  • Akshata Akalwadi K.T.G. College of Physiotherapy and KTG Multi Speciality Hospital, Bangalore-560 091, India.
  • Sai Kumar N. K.T.G. College of Physiotherapy and KTG Multi Speciality Hospital, Bangalore-560 091, India.
  • Unadkat Mona Mahendrabhai K.T.G. College of Physiotherapy and KTG Multi Speciality Hospital. Bangalore. India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2015/v2i4/67747

Keywords:

Neurodynamic sliding technique, Mulligan bent leg raise technique, straight leg raise test, range of motion, muscle tightness, Hamstring flexibility

Abstract

Background: Neurodynamics sliding technique (NDST) and Mulligan bent leg raise technique (MBLR) both have been individually advocated for increasing hamstring flexibility but comparison of these techniques have not been found in studies. The purpose of the study was to find immediate effect of neurodynamic sliding technique versus mulligan bent leg raise technique on hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic individuals.
Methods: An Experimental study designs, with two group 80 asymptomatic normal subjects were randomized 40 subjects into each NDST group and MBLR group. NDST group received Neurodynamic sliding technique and MBLR group received Mulligan bent leg raise technique; passive straight leg raise was taken as outcome measure pre and post intervention.
Results: When means of post intervention were compared there is statistically significant difference in means of passive SLR ROM within the groups but there is no statistically significant difference in post intervention means between the groups.
Conclusion: It is concluded that both NDST and MBLR technique are effective on improving hamstring flexibility for asymptomatic individuals with limited SLR ROM. However there is no significant difference in improvement in hamstring flexibility between the groups.

References

1. MJ Alter. Science of flexibility.2004: 257-260. 2. IshankaWeerasekara, IreshaKumari. The Prevalence of Hamstring Tightness among the Male Athletes of University of Peradeniya in 2010. International Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2013; 1(1):108. 3. BhavanaSuhasMhatrea. Which is the better method to improve “perceived hamstrings tightness” – Exercises targeting neural tissue mobility or exercises targeting hamstrings muscle extensibility? International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2013; 16(3): 153–162. 4. Jessica Kmiecik, Catherine Frattini. ART vs. Graston and Their Effects on Hamstring Flexibility. September 26, 2011. 5. Daniel c, Ann swank. Impact of Prior Exercise on Hamstring Flexibility: A Comparison of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Int J Physiother 2015; 2(4) Page | 665 Static Stretching. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2003; 17(3): 489–492. 6. Yolanda Castellote-Caballero, Marie Carmen Valenza. Effects of a neurodynamic sliding technique on hamstring flexibility in healthy male soccer players. A pilot study. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2013;14(3):156-62. 7. Toby Hall, Sonja Hardt. Mulligan bent leg raise technique—a preliminary randomized trial of immediate effects after a single intervention. Manual Therapy. 2006; (11): 130–135. 8. EmadT.Ahmed, Safa S, Abdelkarim. Efficacy of Muscle Energy Technique versus Static Stretching Technique in Increasing Hamstring Flexibility Post Burn Contracture. International Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences.2013; 2 (1): 22-27. 9. Cynthia Holzman Weppler. Increasing Muscle Extensibility: A Matter of Increasing Length or Modifying Sensation? PhysTher .2010; (90): 438–449. 10. Butler D. The sensitive nervous system. Adelaide: Noigroup Publications.2000 11. Shacklock M. Improving application of neurodynamic (neural tension) testing and treatments: a massage to researchers and clinicians. Manual Therapy. 2005; 10(3): 175- 179. 12. Coppieters. Do ‘sliders’ slide and ‘tensioners’ tension? An analysis of neurodynamic techniques and considerations regarding their application. Manual Therapy. 2008; (13): 213– 221. 13. Roberto Méndez-Sánchez, Francisco Alburquerque - Sendín. Immediate Effects of Adding a Sciatic Nerve Slider Technique on Lumbar and Lower Quadrant Mobility in Soccer Players: A Pilot Study. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2010; 16(6): 669-675. 14. K Konstantinoua. The use and reported effects of mobilization with movement techniques in low back pain management; a cross-sectional descriptive survey of physiotherapists in Britain. Manual Therapy.2002; 7(4): 206–214. 15. Mulligan BR. Manual Therapy; NAGS, SNAGS, MWMS, etc. 6th edition; 2010. 16. S Boyd,Philip S Villa. Normal inter-limb differences during the straight leg raise neurodynamic test: a cross sectional study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2012; 10;13: 245. 17. Walsh J, Hall T. Agreement and correlation between the straight leg raise and slump tests in subjects with leg pain .J Manipulative PhysiolTher .2009; (32): 184–192. 18. Silvio Nussbaumer, Michael Leunig. Validity and test-retest reliability of manual goniometers for measuring passive hip range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement patients. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010; 11: 194 19. Michael A Watklns, Dan L Riddle. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. PhysTher. 1991; 71(2):90-96. 20. Jaemyoung Parka, Jaeyun Cha. Immediate effects of a neurodynamic sciatic nerve slidingtechnique on hamstring flexibility and postural balance inhealthy adults.PhysTherRehabilSci. 2014; 3 (1): 38-42. 21. Aparicio, E. Q., Quirante, L. B. Immediate effects of the suboccipital muscle inhibition technique in subjects with short hamstring syndrome [Randomized controlled trial]. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2009; 32(4): 262-269. 22. Shacklock M. Clinical neurodynamics. 1st ed; 2005. 23. Butler D. Mobilisation of the nervous system. 1st ed; 1991. 24. Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel VK. Kinematics of lumbarintervertebral foramen. Spine. 1983; 8: 348-57. 25. Louis R. Vertebral radicular and vertebromedullary dynamics.AnatomiaClinica 1981; 3:1-11. 26. Chaitow L. Muscle Energy technique-advanced soft tissuetechnique. 3rd ed; 2006. 27. Taylor DC, Brooks DE. Viscoelastic characteristics of muscle:passive stretching versus muscular contractions. MedSci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29(12):1619-24. 28. Harvey LA, Byak AJ. Randomised trial of the effects of four weeks of daily stretchon extensibility of hamstring muscles in people with spinal cordinjuries. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2003;49 (3):176–81. 29. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science.1965; 150: 171-9. 30. Vicenzino B, Paungamali A, Teys P. Mulligan’s mobilization with movement, positional faults and pain relief: currentconcepts from a critical review of literature. Man Ther.2007; 12(2):98- 108.

Published

07-08-2015
Statistics
Abstract Display: 1396
PDF Downloads: 712

How to Cite

Babu , V. K., Akalwadi, A. ., N., S. K., & Mahendrabhai, U. M. . (2015). IMMEDIATE EFFECT OF NEURODYNAMIC SLIDING TECHNIQUE VERSUS MULLIGAN BENT LEG RAISE TECHNIQUE ON HAMSTRING FLEXIBILITY IN ASYMPTOMATIC INDIVIDUALS. International Journal of Physiotherapy, 2(4), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2015/v2i4/67747

Issue

Section

Original Articles