EFFECTIVENESS OF NEURAL TISSUE MOBILISATION ON PAIN, PAIN FREE PASSIVE SLR RANGE OF MOTION AND FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY IN LOW BACK ACHE SUBJECTS WITH SCIATICA

Authors

  • Ms.V. B. Geethika M.P.T. College of physiotherapy, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupathi.
  • Dr. G. Kameswari college of physiotherapy, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupathi.
  • Dr. V. Srikumari College of physiotherapy, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupathi.
  • Dr. K. Madhavi college of physiotherapy, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupathi.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2015/v2i5/78224

Keywords:

NTM, sciatica, Oswestry Disability Index,, Universal Goniometer,, Low Back Ache, Intermittent Lumbar Traction

Abstract

Background: Low back pain is a common, benign, and self-limiting disease that affects almost all persons, with a lifetime prevalence of up to 84%. In contrast, sciatica affects only 40 % of all persons in the Western industrialized countries. In sciatica, pain radiates down the legs, below the knee along the distribution of sciatic nerve. Nerve root compression is the most common cause of sciatica. Neuro dynamics or Neural Tissue Mobilization is relatively new approach in treatment of neuro musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of the study to determine the effectiveness of Neural Tissue mobilization on pain, pain free passive SLR ROM &functional disability in LBA subjects with Sciatica. Objective of the study is to study and compare the effectiveness of Neural tissue mobilization in LBA subjects with sciatica in terms of pain, pain free SLR ROM and Oswestry Disability Index.
Methods: 30 subjects were selected by simple random sampling and assigned in to Control(n=15) &Experimental group(n=15).The subjects in control group were given conventional physiotherapy and those in Experimental group were given Neural Tissue Mobilization in addition to conventional therapy. All the participants were assessed with VAS, ODI and pain free passive SLR ROM.
Results: After the analysis, the results were found to be significant improvement in pain, pain free SLR ROM, ODI in both groups (p< 0.00).But there is a high significance in Experimental group when compared to control group.
Conclusion: Results suggest that NEURAL TISSUE MOBILIZATION along with conventional therapy is more effective in reducing pain, decreasing disability and improving SLR ROM.

References

1. Christian W. A. Pfirrmann, Patrick A. Oberholzer MD, Marco ZanettiMD, Norbert Boos MD, Debra J. Trudell, RA. Selective Nerve Root Blocks for the Treatment of Sciatica: Evaluation of Injection Site and Effectiveness-A Study with Patients and Cadavers. Journal of Radiology. 2001; 221(3):704–711. 2. Panagiotis Korovessis, MD, PhD; Thomas Repantis, MD, PhD; Spyros Zacharatos, MD, PhD; Andreas Baikousis, MD, PhD. Low Back Pain and Sciatica Prevalence and Intensity Reported in a Mediterranean Country: Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis. Healio journal of Orthopedics. 2012; 12(35): e1775-e1784. 3. M. A. Stafford, et al. Sciatica: a review of history, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and the role of epidural steroid injection in management. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2007; 99 (4): 461–73. 4. B W Koes, M W van Tuld, W C Peul. Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. BMJ. 2007; 334:1313. 5. Martijn C. Briet et al.Hermann Hesse and L: Two narratives of sciatica. Journal of neurology and neurosurgery.2012; 114(1):9-11. 6. Sarkari, E. and Multani, N.K. Efficacy of Neural Mobilisation in Sciatica. Journal of Exercise Science and Physiotherapy. 2007; 3(2):136-141. Int J Physiother 2015; 2(5) Page | 717 7. Editorial, Improving application of neuro dynamic (neural tension) testing and treatments: A message to researchers and clinicians. Journal of Manual Therapy. 2005; 10(3): 175–179. 8. Richard F. Ellis et al. Neural Mobilization: A Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with an analysis of therapeutic efficacy. Journal of manual & manipulative therapy. 2008; 16:(1):8-22. 9. Barbara J. Behrens. Holly Beinert. physical Agents Theory and practice.3rd edition;2007. 10. David S. Butler, Mark A. Jones. Mobilisation of the Nervous sytem, churchill Livingstone, Melbourne, Australia. 1991. 11. D Pate, J Goobar, D Resnick, P Haghighi, D J Sartoris, and M N Pathria. Traction osteophytes of the lumbar spine: radiographic-pathologic correlation.1988; 166(3): 843-6. 12. Michelle H. cameron: physical agents in rehabilitation.10th edition;2010. 13. Carylon kisner. therapeutic exercise foundation & techniques.5th edition;2007. 14. Hunter, Mackin, Callahan. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremities.5th edition;2003. 15. David .s .Butler. Adverse mechanical tension in the nervous system: A model for assessment and treatment. Australian journal of physiotherapy.1989;35(4):227-238.

Published

2015-10-09

How to Cite

Geethika, M. B. ., Kameswari, D. G. ., Srikumari, D. V. ., & Madhavi, D. K. . (2015). EFFECTIVENESS OF NEURAL TISSUE MOBILISATION ON PAIN, PAIN FREE PASSIVE SLR RANGE OF MOTION AND FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY IN LOW BACK ACHE SUBJECTS WITH SCIATICA. International Journal of Physiotherapy, 2(5), 712–717. https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2015/v2i5/78224

Issue

Section

Original Articles