EFFICACY OF MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUES AS AN ADJUNCT WITH MULLIGANS MOBILIZATION IN ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS OF SHOULDER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2019/v6i2/181915Keywords:
Adhesive Capsulitis, MET (Muscle energy technique), Mulligan’s mobilization, Range of motion, PainAbstract
Background: Adhesive Capsulitis most commonly referred to as ”Frozen Shoulder” is an insidious Painful Condition with progressive and gradual restriction of all planes of movement in the glenohumeral joint. Evidence shows Mulligan's mobilization with movement (MWM) mobilization technique is more effective than muscle energy techniques (MET) and conventional therapy in improving shoulder function. Therefore the present study intends to determine the efficacy of muscle energy techniques along with Mulligan’s mobilization with movement, in adhesive capsulitis of the
shoulder joint.
Methods: The present randomized controlled trial was conducted among 30 subjects including both sex groups aged between 40-60 years diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. They were randomly assigned into two groups with 15 subjects each. Group A received Mulligan’s mobilization alone, and Group B received Mulligan’s mobilization along with MET. Both the groups received the treatment protocol six times a week for three weeks. Pre and post evaluation of pain was done by using the short-form McGill pain questionnaire, range of motion by the Universal Goniometer
and the functional disability by using Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).
Results: There was a significant improvement (P<0.05) in pre and post-intervention levels in both groups. Between groups analysis, the results are: a range of motion improved 30%, and the values are flexion with a p-value of 0.010, for abduction, internal and external rotations with a p-value of 0.000 except for extension with a p-value of 0.109. On comparison of SPADI using Mann Whitney U test, it showed 50% improvement with a significant difference with a p-value of 0.001 and McGill improved for more than 70% with a p-value of 0.000.
Conclusion: Mulligan’s mobilization along with Muscle Energy Technique is found to be more effective in improving quality of life among subjects with adhesive capsulitis of shoulder than Mulligan’s mobilization alone.
References
Bruckner, F.E.; Nye, C.J. A prospective study of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder ("frozen shoulder") in a high risk population. Q. J. Med. 1981; 50: 191-204
Kessel, L.; Bayley, I.; Young, A. The upper limb: The frozen shoulder. Br. J. Hosp. Med. 1981 25: 334
Neviaser, J.S. Adhesive capsulitis and the stiff and painful shoulder. Orthop. Clin. North Am., 1980; 11: 327-333.
Reeves B. The natural history of the frozen shoulder syndrome. Scand J Rheumatol. 1975; 4:193–196.
Loyd, J.A.; Loyd, H.M. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: Arthrographic diagnosis and treatment. South Med. J. 1983; 76: 879-883.
Saumen Gupta, Kavita Raja, Manikandan N. Impact of adhesive capsulitis on qulaity of life in elderly subjects with diabetes: A cross sectional study. Int. J DiabCtries. 2008; 28(4):125-9.
Cyriax J. Textbook of Orthopedic Medicine, Vol. 1: Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Lesions. 7th Ed. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co; 1978.
Srikanth, Babu V.; Srinivas, M.; Ravindra Kumar B.; and Jalaja Prakash. The effects of Anterior versus Posterior Glide joint Mobilization in Improving Functional Activity of the shoulder in Patients with adhesive capsulitis; Int. Res. J. Biological Sci. 2013; 2(1): 152.
Rizk TE, Pinals RS. Frozen shoulder. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1982; 11:440–452.
Paungmali A, O’Leary S, Souvlis T, Vicenzino B. Hypoalgesic and sympathoexcitatory effects of mobilization with movement for lateral epicondylalgia. Phys Ther. 2003; 83: 374–383
Nicholson CC: The effects of passive joint mobilization on pain and hypomobility associated with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. / Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1985; 6:238246.
The Mulligan Concept of Manual Therapy: Textbook of Techniques. Brain Mulligan. 1st ed; 2015.
Leon Chaitow. Muscle Energy Techniques. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier. 3rd ed; 2006.
Yang JL, Chang CW, Chen SY, Wang SF, Lin JJ. Mobilization techniques in subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: randomized multiple-treatment trial. Phys Ther. 2007; 87: 1307–1315. 7.
Vecchio PC, Kavanagh RT, Hazleman BL, King RH. Community survey of shoulder disorders in the elderly to assess the natural history and effects of treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995; 54:152–154
Melzack.R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire, American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2005; 103:199-202 (evidence level=5).
Gillian A. Hawker, Samra Mian, Tetyana Kendzerska, Melissa French. Measures of adult pain. Arthritis Care & Res. 63, No. S11. 2011; Pp S240-S252.
Cynthia C.Norkin, D. Joyce White. Measurement of joint function- A guide to goniometry. 5th ed; 2015.
Einar Kristian Tveita, Ole Marius Ekeberg, Niels Gunnar Juel and Erik Bautz-Holter. Responsiveness of shoulder pain and disability index in patients with adhesive capsulitis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008, 9:161 10.1186/1471-2474-9-161.
Albert Zaky. End-range mobilization (ERM) versus mobilization with movement (MWM) in treatment of adhesive capsulitis. Bulletin of faculty of physical therapy. 2012;17(2).
Shruti Patel, Sanket Nagrale, Rachana Dabadghav, Nilima Bedekar, Ashok Shyam. The effect of mulligan mobilization of movement technique on internal rotation range of motion of glenohumeral joint in patient with adhesive capsuilites. Ind J Physiother. 2015;3(2)
Johnson AJ1, Godges JJ, Zimmerman GJ, Ounanian LL. The effect of anterior versus posterior glide joint mobilization on external rotation range of motion in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007; Mar;37(3):88-99.
Edrish Saifee Contractor, Dhara Santosh Agnihotri, Ronak Mukeshbhai Patel. Effect of muscle energy technique on range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Int J Health Sci Res. 2016; 6(9):252-256
Goodridge, J.P.: “Muscle energy technique: definition, explanation, methods of procedure,” JAOA, Dec 1981; 81(4): 249- 253.
Ward, Robert C. et al.; Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2nd ed; 2011.
EdrishSaifee Contractor, Dhara Santosh Agnihotri, RonakMukeshbhai Patel. Effect of muscle energy technique on range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Int J Health Sci Res. 2016; 6(9):252-256.
Lokesh M, Raja R, Prashantha S, Rajeev A. comparision of effectiveness of the combination of muscle energy techniques and conventional physiotherapy over conventional physiotherapy alone in periarthritis of shoulder: A randomized study. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2015;(4):545-554.
Mohan Kumar.G, LogabalanT, SenthilNathan.C.V, Rajalakshmi. V, Ramachandran.S, Sudhakar.S. A comparative study on the effectiveness of muscle energy techniques and mobilizations coupled with ultrasound in patients with periarthritis of shoulder joint. Int J Physiother. 2016; 3(5) :619-624.
Ankit Shrivastava, Ashok K Shyam, ShailaSabnis, Parag Sancheti. Randomised controlled study of Mulligan's vs. Maitland's mobilization technique in adhesive capsulitis of shoulder joint. Ind J PhysiotherOccTher. 2011;5(4).
Vermeulen HM, Rozing PM, Obermann WR, et al. Comparison of high-grade and low-grade mobilization techniques in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2006; 86:355–368.
Ranjana, Sahay Pallavi, Banerjee Dhruba, BhushanVidya, EquebalAmeed. Long term efficacy of Maitland mobilization versus Mulligan mobilization in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: A randomized controlled trial. Ind J PhysiotherOccther- an Int J. 2016; 4(4): 91-97.
Arvind Kumar. A comparative study on the efficacy of Maitland's mobilization and muscle energy technique on frozen shoulder. Ind J of Physiother and OccTher. 2015;(4).
Shah Atika Suri, Misra Anand. Comparative study on the effectiveness of Maitland mobilization technique versus muscle energy technique in treatment of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Ind J PhysiotherOccTher. 2013; 7(4):1-6.
Published
PDF Downloads: 1253
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright © Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.