EFFECTIVENESS OF NEURO-MUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS (NMES) IN REDUCING SUBLUXATION OF THE SHOULDER AFTER STROKE: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Authors

  • Appireddygari Haritha Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India.
  • Sri Kumari College of Physiotherapy, SVIMS, Tirupati.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2019/v6i2/181914

Keywords:

Stroke, Shoulder Subluxation, Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES), Motor Assessment Scale

Abstract

Background: Shoulder subluxation in stroke is one of the most common and challenging squeals. Shoulder subluxation limits the patient’s daily activities, and it may lead to permanent disability. NMES (NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation) had been studied widely on shoulder subluxation with controversial results, but no evidence is reported of its effectiveness in shoulder subluxation. As NMES helps in producing strong contraction and thereby helps in improving the strength of the muscles and as it also helps in learning to contract appropriate muscles, this study was made to examine the Effectiveness of Electrical Stimulations in reducing Subluxation of the Shoulder after Stroke.

Method: Study design, A Randomized control experimental design of 30 subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned into two groups, experimental (NMES group) and control (Non-NMES group) with 15 subjects in each group. Outcome measures were taken before and after the intervention on both the groups by using ‘Pain Estimation Scale’ (PES), 'Subluxation Grading’ by X-rays (AP view) and upper arm section of ‘Motor Assessment Scale’(MAS). Experimental group electrodes were placed over posterior deltoid and supraspinatus. Treatment time was 30 mints two times a day for five days in a week and six weeks.

Results: Comparison of electrical stimulation with non-electrical stimulation was done by considering the differences of pre and post treatments in both groups and significance is observed by using independent sample t-test. Statistical analysis proved that there was significant (p<0.05) improvement using NMES compared to NON-NMES in all the three parameters.

Conclusion: Electrical stimulation has shown significant improvement in reducing shoulder subluxation, pain and increased motor recovery of the arm in stroke patients compared to the patient's given non-electrical stimulation training.

References

Panicker J N, Thomas M, Pavithran K, Nair D, Sarma P S. Morbidity predictors in ischemic stroke. Neurol India 2003; 51(1); 49-51.

Bhulla A Gupta,Gupta SB. Predicting Mortality in Stroke Neurology. Neurol India. 2003;50(1); 279-81.

John Chae, Don Mascarenhas, David T.Yu, Andrew Kirstein. Post Stroke Shoulder Pain; Its Relationship to Motor Impairment, Activity Limitation and Quality of Life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(3).;298-301.

Heleen Beckerman, Joke J.ten Kate. Measuring Subluxation of the Hemiplegic Shoulder; Reliability of a Method. Neuro rehabilitation And Neural Repair. 2001; 15(3);249-252.

Kumar, R., Metter, E.J., Mehta, A.J., & Chew, T. Shoulder pain in hemiplegia: the role of exercise. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1990;69(4); 205-208.

Raejean Prevost, A.Bertrand Arsenault, Elisabeth Drouin. Rotation of the Scapula and Shoulder Subluxation in Hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1987; 68(11).786-790.

Robert L. Joynt. The Source of Shoulder pain in hemiplegia. Arch Phy Med Rehabili. 1992; 71(4);409-413.

Susan Rayerson and Kathryn Levit. The Shoulder in Hemiplegia. Fourth Ed: 1998; 205-227.

Morley, A, C English, S and Helli well .S. Management of the Subluxed Low Tone Shoulder. Journal of Physiotherapy .2002; Vol 88(4); 208-216.

Ada L, Foongchomcheay . A. Efficacy of electrical stimulation in Preventing or Reducing Subluxation of The Shoulder after Stroke; a meta – analysis. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy.2002;48(4);257-267.

Richard D. Zorowitz, David Idank,Testuo Ikai, Mary B. hughes OTR, Mark V. Johnston. Shoulder Subluxation After Stroke: a comparison of Four Supports. Arch Phys Med Reb .1995; 76(8); 763-771.

Luc Morin Gina Bravo. Strapping the hemiplegic shoulder; A radiographic evaluation of its efficacy to reduce Subluxation. Physiotherapy Canada. 1997; 49(2);103-108.

Theresa E. Johnston. Basic guidelines of Physiotherapy. Third Ed;247-275

Electrotherapy by John Low and Ann Reed –Published by British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. Third edition: 2000;79-82.

Linn, Sandra L., Granat, Malcolm H,Lees, Kennedy R, Prevention of Shoulder Subluxation After Stroke With Electrical Stimulation. AHA Journals Stroke. 1999; 30(5);963-968.

Lucinda L Baker and Karen Parker. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of the Muscles Surrounding the Shoulder. 1986; 66(12);1930-1937.

Catherine Church, Christopher Price; Anand D. Pandyan, Stuart Huntley, Richard Curless, Helen Rodgers, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Surface Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to the Shoulder After Acute Stroke. American Heart Association, Inc 2006;37(12);2995-3001

Kimberley TJ, Carey JR. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in stroke rehabilitation Minn Med. 2002;85(4);34-37.

Jacqueline Hall, Brain Dudgeon, Mark Guthrie. Validity of clinical measures of shoulder subluxation in adults with Poststroke Hemiplegia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy.1995; 49(6);526-533.

Janet H. Carr, Roberta B. Shepherd-Neurological Rehabilitation; Optimizing Motor Performance, British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. Second Edition 2000; 267-276.

Published

08-04-2019
Statistics
Abstract Display: 1404
PDF Downloads: 1263

How to Cite

Haritha, A. ., & Kumari, S. . (2019). EFFECTIVENESS OF NEURO-MUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS (NMES) IN REDUCING SUBLUXATION OF THE SHOULDER AFTER STROKE: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED EXPERIMENTAL STUDY. International Journal of Physiotherapy, 6(2), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2019/v6i2/181914

Issue

Section

Original Articles