COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION (TENS) VS. INTERFERENTIAL THERAPY (IFT) FOR RELIEF OF PAIN IN PRIMARY DYSMENORRHEA

Authors

  • Mayur Tukaram Revadkar Associate Professor, K. J. Somaiya College of Physiotherapy, Ayurvihar Complex, Everard Nagar, Eastern Express Highway, Sion East, Mumbai 400022.
  • Trineta Mohan Bhojwani Bachelor of Physiotherapy, Project Intern, K. J. Somaiya College of Physiotherapy, Ayurvihar Complex, Everard Nagar, Eastern Express Highway, Sion East, Mumbai 400022.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2019/v6i6/190223

Keywords:

TENS, IFT, primary dysmenorrhea, pain, quality of life, stimulation

Abstract

Background: Dysmenorrhea or pain during menstruation is commonly seen in young women and largely impacts their quality of life. Pain medications are largely used to tackle this situation; however, they have side effects with regular use. Safe, effective pain-relieving modalities are crucial to help women cope with this situation. There is extensive literature proving the effectiveness of TENS for relieving the pain in primary dysmenorrhea; however, literature proving the same for IFT is sparse. Thus this research aims to investigate and compare the effectiveness of both the modalities in primary dysmenorrhea.
Methods: 30 samples(17-25) were included in this study. Using the Simple Random Sampling method, the subjects were divided into two groups. One group received therapy through TENS(80-120 Hz, 20mins, Intensity as per tolerance) and the other through IFT(4PV,80-150HZ, 20 mins, Intensity as per tolerance). Electrical stimulation was given in the region of maximal pain. The Intensity of pain before and after treatment was recorded using the Numerical Pain Scale. The duration of pain relief and the need for analgesic post the therapy was also noted.
Results: TENS and IFT are both extremely effective for the relief of pain in primary dysmenorrhea (P<0.0001). There is no significant difference in their effect on the comparison (P=0.422). And most of the subjects in both groups did not need analgesics after therapy.
Conclusion: Both TENS and IFT are equally effective in the relief of pain in primary dysmenorrhea. However, tolerance to IFT currents is better among young women as they are medium frequency currents.

References

Deborah Lewers, Jo Ann Clelland, James R Jackson, R Edward Varner, Joan Bergman. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Relief of Primary Dysmenorrhea. Physical Therapy. 1989; 69 (1): 3–9.

Parsa, P., Bashirian, Saeed Bashirian. Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on primary dysmenorrhea in adolescent girls. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute (Peshawar - Pakistan), North America. 2013; 27(3):326-330.

Lundeberg, T. Bondesson, L. and Lundströom, V. Relief of primary dysmenorrhea by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Acta Obstetricia et GynecologicaScandinavica. 1985; 64(6): 491-497.

Iacovides S, Avidon I, Bentley A, Baker FC. Reduced quality of life when experiencing menstrual pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014; 93(2):213–217.

Lazzaroni, M. and Bianchi Porro, G. Gastrointestinal side‐effects of traditional non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and new formulations. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2004; 20(2): 48-58.

Morrow C and Naumburg E. Dysmenorrhea. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice.2009; 36(1): 19-32.

Lauretti G, Oliveira R, Parada, F, & Mattos A. The new portable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device was efficacious in the control of primary dysmenorrhea cramp pain. Journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2015. 18(6): 522-526.

Sluka, Kathleen A, Walsh D.Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: Basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness. The Journal of Pain. 2003; 4(3):109 – 121.

John Low and Reed, Von Robertson, Alex Ward. Electrotherapy Explained: Principles and Practice, 4th Edition, 2006.

Andersch, Björn et al. An epidemiologic study of young women with dysmenorrhea. American Journal of Obstetrics &Gynecology. 1982; 144(6): 655 – 660.

Ferreira-Valente, M.A., Pais-Ribeiro, J., & Jensen, M.P. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011; 152 (10): 2399-404.

S. Mannheimer, Jeffrey & C. Whalen, Eileen. The Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Dysmenorrhea. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1985;1(2): 75-84.

Sylvester E, Chidinma S, Ukachukwu O. TENS and heat therapy for pain relief and quality of life improvement in individuals with primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 2016. 24: 86-91.

NazanTugay et al. Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Interferential Current in Primary Dysmenorrhea, Pain Medicine. 2007; 8(4): 295–300.

Alves G, Noble J, Lowe A, & Walsh D. The effect of three electrotherapeutic modalities upon peripheral nerve conduction and mechanical pain threshold. Clinical Physiology. 2001. 21(6): 704-711.

Published

09-12-2019
Statistics
Abstract Display: 4827
PDF Downloads: 1360

How to Cite

Mayur Tukaram Revadkar, & Trineta Mohan Bhojwani. (2019). COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION (TENS) VS. INTERFERENTIAL THERAPY (IFT) FOR RELIEF OF PAIN IN PRIMARY DYSMENORRHEA. International Journal of Physiotherapy, 6(6), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2019/v6i6/190223

Issue

Section

Original Articles