STUDENTS’ REASONING ACHIEVEMENT BASED ON NET AND WALL CATEGORY IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2020/v7i1/193671Keywords:
Reasoning, Physical Education, Net, and Wall Category, Teaching Games for Understanding, Higher Order Thinking Skills.Abstract
Background: Reasoning refers to logical thinking involving problem-solving and decision-making skills. Physical Education teachers need to manage teaching and learning processes efficiently to build reasoning ability among students. The purpose of this study was to identify the students’ reasoning achievement level based on the net and wall category using RSAT in Physical Education.
Methods: A quasi-experimental design was used in this study in four schools in the district of Hilir Perak, Perak. The sample of the study consisted of 240 Form 2 students who used RSAT instrument (validity, r = .78; reliability, r = .74) in the pre-test and post-test. The treatment group underwent teaching and learning programs based on the net and wall TGfU model while the control group underwent the badminton technical model. The subjects of the control group received six teaching and learning sessions based on the plans provided.
Results: The pre-test result of treatment group showed overall (M = 2.21; SD = 0.30) compared to the control group (M = 2.18; SD = 0.43). The students of the treatment group (M = 3.64; SD = 0.67) showed higher mean score compared to control group (M = 2.88; SD = 0.82) in post-test. The achievement level of the treatment group students showed that the majority of respondents achieved good level (n = 85; 60.70%) while the control group achieved pass level (n = 62; 44.30%).
Conclusion: The study concluded that the use of RSAT could improve the reasoning level among students holistically and comprehensively. The implication of the study suggested an RSAT instrument to be used as an alternative instrument for determining the level of the learning domain based on reasoning to achieve higher-order thinking skills.
References
Ministry of Education Malaysia (2012). Buku panduan kemahiran menaakul. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Perkembangan Kurikulum.
W. Terry & J. Higgs (1993). Educational programmers to develop clinical reasoning skills. Australian Journal & Physiotherapy, 39, 47-51.
W. C. Mobley (2010). Role of basic science in clinical reasoning education. AACP Meeting and Seminar, 10-14 July.
Exforsys Inc-Self- Study Online Training website (2010). Thinking skill: Reasoning. http://www.exforsys.com/career-center/coreskills/thinking-skill. Reasoning html.
M. F. Erin, H. Ilonca, B. Tina, J. S. Richard & T. S. Jonathan (2008). A framework for analyzing reasoning in science classroom discourse. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, March 24-28, 2008.
A. S. Goodie, P. Doshi & D. L. Young (2012). Levels of theory-of-mind reasoning in competitive games. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, J. Behav. Dec. Making, 25, 95-108.
M. Blomquist, T. Vanttinen, & P. Luhtanen, (2005). Assessment of secondary school students' decision-making and game-play ability in soccer. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(2), 107-119.
P. Pearson & P. Webb (2008). Developing effective questioning in teaching games for understanding (TGfU). A paper presented at the 1st Asia Pacific sport in education conference, Adelaide.
C. Dulceanu (2011). Reasoning the need for sports promotion and guidance in field events. ARENA: Journal of Physical Activities 35, 69-74.
P. K. Miller, L. Rowe, C. Cronin & T. M. Bampouras (2012). Heuristic reasoning and the observer’s view: The influence of example-availability on ad-hoc frequency judgments in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 24, 290-302.
S. Stolz & S. Pill (2014). Teaching games and sport for understanding: Exploring and reconsidering its relevance in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20(1), 36-7.
A. E. Lawson, B. Clark, E. Cramer-Meldrum, K. A. Falconer, J. M. Sequist & Y. J. Kwon (2000). Development Instrument Classroom Test of reasoning: Do two levels of general hypothesis-testing skills exist? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (1), 81-101.
A. Chatzipanteli, N. Digelidis & R. Dean (2015). Promoting students’ metacognitive behavior in physical education through TGfU. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 28-36.
L. W. Anderson, & D. R. Krathwohl (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
J. M. Harrison, C. L. Blakemore, R. P. Richards, G. Fellingham, J. Oliver & C. Wilkinson (2004). The effects of two-instructional models-tactical and skill teaching-on skill development and game play, knowledge, self-efficacy, and student perception in volleyball. The Physical Educator, 61(4), 186–199.
M. C. McNeill, C. Michael, J. M. Fry, S. C. Wright, C. W. K. Tan, & T. Rossi (2008). Structuring time and questioning to achieve tactical awareness in games lessons. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13(3), 231–249.
R. Psotta & A. Martin (2011). Changes in decision making skill and skill execution in soccer performance: The intervention study. Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomic, Gymn, 41(2), 7-15.
Published
Abstract Display: 553 
PDF Downloads: 651 How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright © Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This work is licensed under a