ANTHROPOMETRIC, PHYSICAL FITNESS AND KINEMATICS ANALYSIS OF THE JUMP SHOT OF FEMALE HANDBALL PLAYERS - A CASE STUDY OF THE ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY BAHAWALPUR, PAKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2020/v7i3/703Keywords:
kinematics, handball, jump shot, anthropometry, physical fitness, handball performance, female handball playersAbstract
Background: This study was designed in two poles, 1st to examine the kinematic parameters of the handball jump shot and 2nd to compare the anthropometric, and physical fitness of novice and skilled female handball players of the university level.
Methods: This study design was cross-sectional, and a purposive sampling method was adopted for selecting the participants. The sample consisted of (n = 20) novice, and (n = 20) university female handball players. The selected variables were standing broad jump, vertical jump, flexibility, 30-m dash, agility, stride length, stature, body mass, arm length, upper arm girth, leg length, chest girth, waist girth, hip girth, thigh girth, calf girth, hand length, handbreadth and shoulder breadth, pelvic breadth, transverse breadth, elbow and knee breadth, handgrip and arm span, left and right knee angle, left and right elbow angle. An Independent t-test was applied to examine differences between skilled and novice players in kinematics and anthropometric variables.
Results: Results showed the skilled female players were significantly higher than the novice players in the following as right elbow angle at the start of movement (<. 03), left elbow angle at the start of movement (<. 00), right knee angle at the start of movements (< .03), stride length at release (< .01), 30-meter dash (< .04), handgrip strength(< .02), agility (< .03), forearm girth (< .03), thigh girth (< . 03) and arm span (< .04).
Conclusion: It was concluded the higher angle of elbows, right knee along with more prolonged stride increase the movement capacity of skilled female handball player while attempting the jump shots than novice female players. On the other hand, the anthropometric and fitness measures as arm span, thigh girth, running speed, handgrip strength, and agility increase the performance of skilled players than the novice. The female handball coaches may enhance the performance of novice players by focusing on the specific training of extension and flexion of elbows and stride movement as well as enhancing the physical fitness of female handball players. Future studies would focus on the training of handball players to increase the jump shot performance of players.
References
Debanne T, Laffaye G. Predicting the throwing velocity of the ball in handball with anthropometric variables and isotonic tests. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2011; 29(7): 705-713.
Van den Tillaar R, Ettema GA. three-dimensional analysis of overarm throwing in experienced handball players. Journal of applied biomechanics. 2007; 23(1): 12-19.
Wagner H, Pfusterschmied J, Von Duvillard SP, Müller E. Skill-dependent proximal-to distal sequence in team-handball throwing. Journal of Sport Sciences. 2012; 30(1): 21-29.
Šibila M, Pori P, Bon M. Basic kinematic differences between two types of Jump shot techniques in handball. Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Gymnica. 2003; 33(1): 19-26.
Cetin E, Ozdol Y. Jump shot performance and strength training in young team handball players. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 46: 3187-3190.
Gorostiaga EM, Granados C, Ibanez J, Izquierdo M. Differences in physical fitness and throwing velocity among elite and amateur male handball players. International journal of sports medicine. 2005; 26(03): 225-232.
Van Den Tillaar R, Cabri JM. Gender differences in the kinematics and ball velocity of overarm throwing in elite team handball players. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2012; 30(8): 807-813.
Granados C, Izquierdo M, Ibanez J, Ruesta M, Gorostiaga EM. Are there any differences in physical fitness and throwing velocity between national and international elite female handball players? The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013; 27(3): 723-732.
Bon M, Pori P, Šibila M. Position-related differences in selected morphological body characteristics of top-level female handball players. Collegium antropologicum. 2015; 39(3): 631-639.
Kamal SA. Manual for obtaining anthropometric measurements. The-NGDS-Pilot-Project Publication, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan, version. 2006; 9: 11.
Marfell-Jones M J, Stewart AD, De Ridder JH. International standards for anthropometric assessment. Adelaide. 2012.
Kamal SA, Azeemi HI, Khan SR. Psychological testing, physical examination and fitness testing of primary-school students for participation in gymnastic activities. Pumukkale Journal of Sport Sciences. 2017; 8(2):15-40.
Haq MZ, Afzal A, Yaqoob M, Abbas S, Ahmad H, Iqbal A. Anthropometric characteristics, and physical fitness of urban and rural 8-10 years old schoolgirls of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. International Journal of Physiotherapy. 2019; 6(2): 46-51.
Bartlett R. Introduction to sports biomechanics: Analysing human movement patterns. Routledge. 2014.
Lindner M, Kotschwar A, Zsoldos RR, Groesel M, Peham C. The jump shot–biomechanical analysis focused on lateral ankle ligaments. Journal of biomechanics. 2012; 45(1): 202-206.
Peña J, Moreno-Doutres D, Coma J, Cook M, Buscà B. Anthropometric and fitness profile of high- level basketball, handball, and volleyball players. Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte. 2018; 11(1): 30-35.
Published
PDF Downloads: 586
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright © Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.