STUDY TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STATIC STRETCH AND HOLD RELAX TECHNIQUE OVER HAMSTRING FLEXIBILITY

Authors

  • Shanthi C College of Physiotherapy, SVIMS, Tirupati.
  • Kamaraju B Shridevi College of Physiotherapy, Tumkur, Karnataka
  • Srikanth .I Shri Devi College of Physiotherapy, Tumkur-6, Karnataka.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2014/v1i4/54559

Keywords:

Sit and Reach Test, Hamstring, Flexibility, Hold Relax and static stretch.

Abstract

Background: Numerous studies have documented on flexibility of muscles. Flexibility is defined as the ability of the muscles to lengthen allowing one joint or more than one joint in a series to move through a range of motion .Flexibility allows tissue to accommodate more easily to stress thus minimizing or preventing muscle injury. But this study sought to identify the study to compare the effectiveness of Static stretch and Hold relax technique over the hamstring flexibility.
Methods: 30 healthy male adults with Hamstring tightness aged 21 to 35 years selected from general population through simple randomized technique. Samples are divided into two groups, static stretch Group-I(no.15) and Group-II Hold relax (no.=15).The outcome was measured with help of sit & reach test to see the Hamstring flexibility.
Results: Comparison of the post test values of the group I and group II shows a significant difference between the outcomes of two groups with a “t” calculated value of 0.738 (unpaired “t” test).
Conclusion: Both static stretch and hold relax Technique can cause very highly significant result in Hamstring Flexibility, further comparison shows very high significant difference between two groups and concludes that hold relax is better than static stretch in Hamstring Flexibility. 

Published

07-10-2014
Statistics
Abstract Display: 453
PDF Downloads: 391

How to Cite

C , S. ., B , K. ., & .I , S. . (2014). STUDY TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STATIC STRETCH AND HOLD RELAX TECHNIQUE OVER HAMSTRING FLEXIBILITY. International Journal of Physiotherapy, 1(4), 205–208. https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2014/v1i4/54559

Issue

Section

Original Articles